Publicidade, mídia, leis de incentivo: da experiência cultural à experiência de marca

Abstract

The observation of the existence of advertising paid with money from the culture incentive laws is the question of what this research starts, this configures the use of public money to a private brand experience. The non-advertisement of sponsor brands by cultural journalism leads to the questions: How does the brand visibility occurs, once the cultural journalism does not mention the sponsor when it communicates a cultural activity financed by tax relief? This research proposes a hypothesis opposed to the hegemonic understanding that what motivates companies is the value brought by associating its brand to a cultural activity. It aims to demonstrate that the higher interest is at brand publicity characterized by adverts financed by fiscal exemption. Thus, indicating a unclear promiscuous relation between commercial interests and public money. Therefore, the higher interest would not be the fiscal exemption or the positive image of associating a brand to an event, but the share allowed by law to be direct to publicity. This reflection is based on the studies of Adorno and Horkheimer (1986), Giorgio Agambem (2009), Naomi Klein (2004), Frederic Jameson (2001; 2007) and Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt (2003), as well as the discussions based on the analysis of these three authors by Sílvio Camargo (2011). It is in the context of late capitalism that the incentive to culture laws have been developed. The media is inserted in this context when it collaborates to transform cultural events in brand promotion opportunities. The corpus of the work includes the analysis of the media treatment given to three cultural high impact activities: The SWU Festival, The Mamma Mia Musical and the Telefônica Sonidos Festival